Today is the birthday of Jerry Siegel, co-creator of Superman, who changed the pop culture landscape in a single bound. There wouldn't be a comic book business as we know it without him.
We all stand on his shoulders.
SEMI-REGULAR MUSINGS FROM THE SEMI-REGULAR MIND OF WRITER J.M. DeMATTEIS
Late September saw the release of The DC Universe by Keith Giffen—which is a sampler of some of the brilliant work my much-missed friend and frequent creative collaborator produced for the company. I wrote an intro for the book and you can read it below. Enjoy!
Okay, you didn’t squeeze his belly—he’d probably slug you if you did—but it didn’t take much to get endless characters and concepts flowing out of Keith’s head. The man possessed one of the most formidable imaginations in comics. Scratch that, I’d put Keith’s imagination up against anyone’s in any field. He was a story machine, a massive, and genuinely impressive, creative dynamo. I’ve often called him the Jack Kirby of my generation of comic book creators and, given my respect for Kirby—the preeminent god in my comic book pantheon—that’s not a statement I make lightly.
If memory serves (and I can’t swear that it does), Giffen and I first worked together on a Doctor Fate mini-series that I wrote and he drew (Keith being Keith, he continually threw in amazing visual bits and surprising twists in the tale. He was never “just” an artist). This was a little before we were put together, as a writing team, on Justice League International. We didn’t know it then—how could we?—but that began a collaboration that lasted for more than three decades. After Keith passed, I made a list of all the books we’d worked on together—JLI and its multiple spin-offs, Booster Gold, Justice League 3000, Metal Men, Larfleeze (and the list goes on, at DC and elsewhere)—astonished at the volume of work we produced.
Did I say work? Collaborating with Keith was more like two kids playing in a sandbox. I’ve often said (and I’m sure his other writing partners—which include Paul Levitz, Robert Loren Fleming, Tom and Mary Bierbaum, and Jeff Lemire, to name just a few—would agree) that it wasn’t the project that mattered when I was working with Keith, it was the collaboration itself, the joy of creating something together, bouncing ideas back and forth, trying to top each other, and having tremendous fun doing it. (I remember when Keith called me up and said DC wanted us to develop a new twist on Scooby-Doo called Scooby Apocalypse. If anyone else had called with that suggestion, I might have hung up on them. But it was Keith, I immediately said yes, and SA turned into a wonderful three-year gig: one of my favorite Giffen-DeMatteis collaborations.)
Keith had no creative ego. He loved it when I added story elements and character developments that weren’t in his plot and, in the following issues, he would build on what I’d done, give it all a uniquely Giffenesque spin, then throw it back to me. It was like a game of tennis, but with ideas instead of a ball. Together we created something in our work—an offbeat and very specific tone and attitude—neither of us could have done alone. (Keith always encouraged his creative partners to revise, expand, alter. He’d have been disappointed if we’d just parroted what he’d done.)
Keith and I eventually achieved a kind of mind meld. I’d take a quick look at a Giffen plot—usually drawn out as a kind of mini-comic, with layouts that looked like a combination of Kirby and Harvey Kurtzman, with guide notes to let me know where the story was going—and I was off. I didn’t have to think about it, I just built on the rock-solid foundation Keith provided, got the characters talking to each other, and let them surprise me. And, I hoped, surprise Giffen, in turn.
Over the years we got to know each other not just as fellow professionals, but as friends. What was he like when he was away from the computer and drawing board? Smart, incisive, and so damn funny he could have had his own HBO comedy special. And the man loved playing the curmudgeon (imagine, if you will, the bastard child of Harlan Ellison and the acerbic Dr. Cox from Scrubs and you’ll have some idea of the Classic Giffen Persona). It was a wonderful performance, but that’s what at least half of it was: a performance. Beneath that carefully-cultivated, apparently-cynical shell was a thoughtful, heartfelt family man and consummate pro. A loyal friend and generous collaborator, who’d go out of his way to champion fellow freelancers. (Please note I said half of it was performance: There’s no denying Keith enjoyed indulging the other half, saying outrageous things and basking in the stunned reactions.)
It’s been more than two years since he passed away, but I still can’t wrap my head around the fact that we live in a Giffenless universe. Keith had his share of health issues, but he was such a feisty, resilient, tenacious guy I was sure he’d outlive us all. Whenever life knocked him down, he’d get up again (and sometimes that getting up wasn’t easy)—then shrug, make a joke, and start working on another comic book. And, who knows, given his mischievous, some might say wicked, sense of humor, it’s always possible he faked his death and right now he’s sitting on a beach somewhere, ever-present cigarette in hand, blowing smoke-rings, basking in the sun, and laughing at all of us. (Okay, that’s not true. But wouldn’t it be wonderful if it was?)
I’ll end with my wife’s words when she heard Keith died. “He was,” she said, “like a character out of a Keith Giffen story.” I can think of no higher praise.
I was recently asked to provide an introduction for a Hungarian collection of my Amazing Spider-Man story "Shrieking." It was an interesting exercise going back in time, assessing a story written decades ago, and remembering my collaboration with the great Mark Bagley. You can read the intro below. Enjoy!
Family is the theme that runs through all four issues of “Shrieking,” which was my first continuing storyline when I took over the writing duties on Amazing Spider-Man, way back in 1994 (has it really been that long?). I’d explored the theme before in Spider-Man stories, most notably in the “Child Within” arc in Spectacular Spider-Man; but those stories focused on the singular experiences of Peter Parker, Harry Osborn, and Edward Whelan. With “Shrieking,” Mark Bagley (more about him later) and I were focusing on the family as a unit. On the internal dynamics that can either lift us up or shatter our souls.
For Peter Parker that dynamic flows from past to future. Still reeling from the revelation that his parents—apparently returned from the dead—were actually robotic imposters, Peter, in shock and emotional agony, finds it difficult, almost impossible, to sustain his relationship with Mary Jane, retreating—much as Peter does in the recent Brand New Day film—into his Spider-Man persona, rejecting his wife and literally cocooning himself in an effort to avoid the inevitable struggles of being human. (The rupture in her marriage also forces MJ to confront the shadows of her own troubled childhood, something she’d been avoiding for years.)
There’s nothing functional or loving about the family unit Louise Barrison (aka Shriek) tries to build with her “son,” Malcolm Mcbride (aka Carrion). Barrison (I provided Louise’s civilian name, but the character was created by writer Tom DeFalco during the “Maximum Carnage” crossover) has suffered unimaginable childhood abuses and that pain has driven her to madness. For all that, she’s trying, in her demented way, to assuage that childhood pain by building a new family. Malcolm, tortured by the abominable deeds of his alter ego, rejects Shriek’s efforts, but Carrion embraces Louise and becomes a willing part of this massively dysfunctional delusion.
Perhaps the true hero of “Shrieking” isn’t Spider-Man at all, but Malcolm’s mother, Beatrice McBride, whose love for her son burns fierce and bright—and whose determination to bring Malcolm back into her maternal arms will not be broken, no matter what violent and seemingly unassailable obstructions Shriek throws in her way. Beatrice is the very embodiment of family at its most heart-forward and self-sacrificing. “Shrieking” is a dark story, but Bea McBride is the blazing light that shines in the heart of that darkness. (In the end, even Shriek is touched by that light; it momentarily pierces her madness and drives her to a stunning act of self-sacrifice.)
Comics is a visual medium, and a script—no matter how good—rises and falls with the illustrative power and storytelling skill of the artist. For “Shrieking” I was paired with one of the most celebrated Spider-Man artists of the past forty years, Mark Bagley. Success as a comic book artist isn’t just about being able to draw well, it’s about telling a story from panel to panel, emphasizing the right moments, drawing the eye across the page in such a natural way that the reader sees the characters actually move, breathe, and come alive. Mark is able to do all that and more. He delivers the massive action sequences necessary for superhero tales, but his work also underscores the powerful emotions at the core of our tale. I was fortunate to have him as a collaborator during my Amazing run. Fortunate, too, to be working with one of Marvel’s most gifted editors, Danny Fingeroth, who remains a dear friend to this day.
“Shrieking,” as noted, is an unusually dark Spider-Man story, but, at its core, it’s about moving through that darkness toward something better, truer, more lasting. And that, I think, is the essence of Spider-Man. Peter Parker, no matter what terrible obstacles he faces—outside of or, just as often, within himself—will always do the right thing, always rise up and embrace kindness, compassion, and hope.
May we all follow his example.
Coming up in one week: FanX Salt Lake—September 24th through 26th at the Salt Palace Convention Center in Salt Lake City. I haven't been to the beautiful state of Utah for many years and I've never attended a con there, so this should be a great time. If you're attending, please come by and say hello.